Aki ... yep, I figured that out a bit ago, I think. In the ntp.conf file I had used
P.S. big thanks to @sunrat for the new inline code feature.
server 0.pool.time.nist.gov prefer iburst which is incorrect it seems. I changed that topool time.nist.gov iburst and the results are below. I think I have it correct now. Code:
systemctl status ntp● ntpsec.service - Network Time Service Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ntpsec.service; enabled; preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2024-04-08 15:18:40 EDT; 9s ago Docs: man:ntpd(8) Process: 31256 ExecStart=/usr/libexec/ntpsec/ntp-systemd-wrapper (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 31261 (ntpd) Tasks: 1 (limit: 18794) Memory: 10.6M CPU: 57ms CGroup: /system.slice/ntpsec.service └─31261 /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /run/ntpd.pid -c /etc/ntpsec/ntp.conf -g -N -u ntpsec:ntpsec ntpd[31261]: IO: Listening on routing socket on fd #22 for interface updates ntpd[31261]: INIT: MRU 10922 entries, 13 hash bits, 65536 bytes ntpd[31261]: INIT: Built with OpenSSL 3.0.9 30 May 2023, 30000090 ntpd[31261]: INIT: Running with OpenSSL 3.0.11 19 Sep 2023, 300000b0 ntpd[31261]: NTSc: Using system default root certificates. ntpd[31261]: DNS: dns_probe: time.nist.gov, cast_flags:8, flags:101 ntpd[31261]: DNS: dns_check: processing time.nist.gov, 8, 101 ntpd[31261]: DNS: Pool taking: 132.163.96.6 ntpd[31261]: DNS: Pool taking: 2610:20:6f97:97::4 ntpd[31261]: DNS: dns_take_status: time.nist.gov=>good, 8ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter======================================================================================================= time.nist.gov .POOL. 16 p - 256 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002+time-e-b.nist.gov .NIST. 1 u 43 64 1 48.2605 121.8131 0.0164 time-d-wwv.nist.gov .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002timedatectl status Local time: Mon 2024-04-08 15:20:09 EDT Universal time: Mon 2024-04-08 19:20:09 UTC RTC time: Mon 2024-04-08 19:20:09 Time zone: US/Eastern (EDT, -0400)System clock synchronized: yes NTP service: n/a RTC in local TZ: noP.S. big thanks to @sunrat for the new inline code feature.
Statistics: Posted by Augie77 — 2024-04-08 19:31